QET AND P-CTC Relative Time Location/Locality


Relative Time Location/Locality



A sends back measurement to B in past, B does operation and gets positive energy density allowing A in the future to get negative energy density

\

B does measurement in the future, and sends measurement to past where A does local operation and creates negative energy density for B in the future



or is it


A does measurement in past, and sends measurement to B in the future where they do local operation that creates negative energy density in the past 


	IT sounds like QET with out P CTC - but why couldn't the key point happen, negative energy density in the past



	If you use the negative energy density in the past, there would be a diffusion or balancing so the negative energy density
	in the future is back to less, so that the energy density of the field is averaged "null?" to be able to do it all again?????


	if this happens, 


			when you "use" the negative energy density whenever, what happens, does density decrease to more positive?


			if you did it this way, and you don't "use" the negative energy density, wouldn't the future make
			the density to be looping more and more negative density?





